4.4 Article

Salinisation impacts in life cycle assessment: a review of challenges and options towards their consistent integration

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1040-x

关键词

Irrigation; Land use change; Life cycle impact assessment; Life cycle inventory; Salinisation; Soil; Resource; Water

资金

  1. ADEME (Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maitrise de l'Energie)
  2. Cirad (Centre de cooperation internationale en recherche agronomique pour le developpement)
  3. Industrial Chair for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment ELSA-PACT (a research project of ELSA-Environmental Life Cycle and Sustainability Assessment): Suez Environment
  4. Compagnie d'amenagement du Bas-Rhone et du Languedoc (BRL)
  5. Val d'Orbieu-UCCOAR
  6. EVEA
  7. ANR
  8. IRSTEA
  9. Montpellier SupAgro
  10. Ecole des Mines d'Ales
  11. CIRAD
  12. ONEMA
  13. ADEME
  14. Region Languedoc-Roussillon
  15. Societe du Canal de Provence (SCP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salinisation is a threat not only to arable land but also to freshwater resources. Nevertheless, salinisation impacts have been rarely and only partially included in life cycle assessment (LCA) so far. The objectives of this review paper were to give a comprehensive overview of salinisation mechanisms due to human interventions, analyse the completeness, relevance and scientific robustness of existing published methods addressing salinisation in LCA and provide recommendations towards a comprehensive integration of salinisation within the impact modelling frameworks in LCA. First, with the support of salinisation experts and related literature, we highlighted multiple causes of soil and water salinisation and presented induced effects on human health, ecosystems and resources. Second, existing life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods addressing salinisation were analysed against the International Reference Life Cycle Data System analysis grid of the European Commission. Third, adopting a holistic approach, the modelling options for salinisation impacts were analysed in agreement with up-to-date LCIA frameworks and models. We proposed a categorisation of salinisation processes in four main types based on salinisation determinism: land use change, irrigation, brine disposal and overuse of a water body. For each salinisation type, key human management and biophysical factors involved were identified. Although the existing methods addressing salinisation in LCA are important and relevant contributions, they are often incomplete with regards to both the salinisation pathways they address and their geographical validity. Thus, there is a lack of a consistent framework for salinisation impact assessment in LCA. In analysing existing LCIA models, we discussed the inventory and impact assessment boundary options. The land use/land use change framework represents a good basis for the integration of salinisation impacts due to a land use change but should be completed to account for off-site impacts. Conversely, the land use/land use change framework is not appropriate to model salinisation due to irrigation, overuse of a water body and brine disposal. For all salinisation pathways, a bottom-up approach describing the environmental mechanisms (fate, exposure and effect) is recommended rather than an empirical or top-down approach because (i) salts and water are mobile and theirs effects are interconnected; (ii) water and soil characteristics vary greatly spatially; (iii) this approach allows the evaluation of both on- and off-site impacts and (iv) it is the best way to discriminate systems and support a reliable eco-design. This paper highlights the importance of including salinisation impacts in LCA. Much research effort is still required to include salinisation impacts in a global, consistent and operational manner in LCA, and this paper provides the basis for future methodological developments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据