4.3 Article

Why are beliefs in different conspiracy theories positively correlated across individuals? Testing monological network versus unidimensional factor model explanations

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 1011-1031

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12518

关键词

conspiracies; latent variable analysis; monological belief systems; network analysis

资金

  1. Massey University [RM22245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A substantial minority of the public express belief in conspiracy theories and those who believe one conspiracy theory are more likely to believe in others. However, the reason behind this positive manifold of belief in conspiracy theories is unclear. This study tested both the unidimensional factor model and a network model, and the results favored the network model, suggesting that beliefs in various conspiracy theories support one another in a mutually reinforcing network of beliefs.
A substantial minority of the public express belief in conspiracy theories. A robust phenomenon in this area is that people who believe one conspiracy theory are more likely to believe in others. But the reason for this positive manifold of belief in conspiracy theories is unclear. One possibility is that a single underlying latent factor (e.g. conspiracism) causes variation in belief in specific conspiracy theories. Another possibility is that beliefs in various conspiracy theories support one another in a mutually reinforcing network of beliefs (the monological belief system theory). While the monological theory has been influential in the literature, the fact that it can be operationalised as a statistical network model has not previously been recognised. In this study, we therefore tested both the unidimensional factor model and a network model. Participants were 1553 American adults recruited via Prolific. Belief in conspiracies was measured using an adapted version of the Belief in Conspiracy Theories Inventory. The fit of the two competing models was evaluated both by using van Bork et al.'s (Psychometrika, 83, 2018, 443, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 56, 2019, 175) method for testing network versus unidimensional factor models, as well as by evaluating goodness of fit to the sample covariance matrix. In both cases, evaluation of fit according to our pre-registered inferential criteria favoured the network model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据