Gender-equal funding rates conceal unequal evaluations

Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency

(2019) Holly O Witteman et al.   LANCET

Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators

(2019) Diego F. M. Oliveira et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Does Gender Bias Still Affect Women in Science?

(2019) Rachel L. Roper   MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS

Measuring Diversity of the National Institutes of Health–Funded Workforce

(2016) Misty L. Heggeness et al.   ACADEMIC MEDICINE

When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint vs. Separate Evaluation

(2016) Iris Bohnet et al.   MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience

(2016) Kuheli Dutt et al.   Nature Geoscience

A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation.

(2016) Katerina Bezrukova et al.   PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN

The Frequency of “Brilliant” and “Genius” in Teaching Evaluations Predicts the Representation of Women and African Americans across Fields

(2016) Daniel Storage et al.   PLoS One

Gender balance: Women are funded more fairly in social science

(2015) Paul J. Boyle et al.   NATURE

Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson’s paradox

(2015) Casper J. Albers   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

No evidence that gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands: A reaction to van der Lee and Ellemers

(2015) Beate Volker et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands

(2015) Romy van der Lee et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

(2015) Wendy M. Williams et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder

(2015) Ian M. Handley et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women

(2014) J. M. Sheltzer et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students

(2012) C. A. Moss-Racusin et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

(2011) S. J. Ceci et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review

(2009) Robyn M. Borsuk et al.   BIOSCIENCE

Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications and Funding Outcomes for Medical School Faculty

(2008) Susan E. Waisbren et al.   JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH

SOCIOLOGY: The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications

(2008) T. J. Ley et al.   SCIENCE

Journal review and gender equality: a critical comment on Budden et al.

(2008) R WHITTAKER   TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION

Does double-blind review benefit female authors?

(2008) Thomas J. Webb et al.   TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

(2007) A BUDDEN et al.   TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION