4.5 Article

Potential advantage of rhizosheath microbiome, in contrast to rhizosphere microbiome, to improve drought tolerance in crops

期刊

RHIZOSPHERE
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100439

关键词

Action mechanisms; Drought stress alleviation; Plant growth-promoting bacteria; Plant microbiome; Rhizosheath formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting microorganisms can minimize the effects of drought stress on plants and enhance plant growth. The rhizosheath and its microbiome play a crucial role in improving plant drought tolerance and serve as a valuable source for isolating drought-tolerant microorganisms with plant growth promotion potential.
Drought stress-single or in combination with abiotic and biotic stresses-is a major constraint on agricultural production and threatens food security worldwide. This has further led to the need for some environmentally friendly approaches to ensure global food security. In this regard, using the potential of drought tolerant-plant growth-promoting microorganisms to minimize the effects of drought stress is an important effort. It seems that the microorganisms that live in plant rhizosheaths, which are preferentially formed in drier soils, have a higher potential to alleviate drought stress and enhance plant productivity compared to the microorganisms isolated from plant rhizosphere. By some known mechanisms, these microorganisms not only ensure the survival of plant under drought stress but also augment the plant growth. Here, the importance of rhizosheath and its microbiome in improving plant drought tolerance and also its importance as a useful source for isolating drought-tolerant microorganisms with plant growth promotion potential are highlighted. Future directions to the study of the rhizosheath microbiome are also suggested. The knowledge on rhizosheath microbiome is essential for developing strategies for shaping the rhizosheath to benefit drought-stressed plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据