4.6 Article

Chromosome length and gene density contribute to micronuclear membrane stability

期刊

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202101210

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R35GM124766]
  2. Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium [P30 CA015704]
  3. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [T32CA009657]
  4. Rita Allen Foundation Scholars Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The length and gene density of the trapped chromosome are key factors determining the membrane stability and timing of rupture of micronuclei. Nuclear envelope composition defects only partly explain the membrane stability in micronuclei.
Micronuclei are derived from missegregated chromosomes and frequently lose membrane integrity, leading to DNA damage, innate immune activation, and metastatic signaling. Here, we demonstrate that two characteristics of the trapped chromosome, length and gene density, are key contributors to micronuclei membrane stability and determine the timing of micronucleus rupture. We demonstrate that these results are not due to chromosome-specific differences in spindle position or initial protein recruitment during post-mitotic nuclear envelope assembly. Micronucleus size strongly correlates with lamin B1 levels and nuclear pore density in intact micronuclei, but, unexpectedly, lamin B1 levels do not completely predict nuclear lamina organization or membrane stability. Instead, small gene-dense micronuclei have decreased nuclear lamina gaps compared to large micronuclei, despite very low levels of lamin B1. Our data strongly suggest that nuclear envelope composition defects previously correlated with membrane rupture only partly explain membrane stability in micronuclei. We propose that an unknown factor linked to gene density has a separate function that inhibits the appearance of nuclear lamina gaps and delays membrane rupture until late in the cell cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据