4.6 Article

The different activities of RNA G-quadruplex structures are controlled by flanking sequences

期刊

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202101232

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Universite de Paris
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [FDT202001010912]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ENOCH) [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868]
  4. MH CZ-DRO (MMCI) [00209805]
  5. Cancerforskningsfonden Norr, Cancerfonden [160598]
  6. Vetenskapsradet
  7. International Centre for Cancer Vaccine Science within the International Research Agendas program of the Foundation for Polish Science
  8. European Union under the European Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of G-quadruplex (G4) RNA structures is multifunctional, dynamic, and context-dependent. They play a role in nucleolin binding, nuclear mRNA retention, mRNA translation inhibition, and immune evasion.
The role of G-quadruplex (G4) RNA structures is multifaceted and controversial. Here, we have used as a model the EBV-encoded EBNA1 and the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)encoded LANAI mRNAs. We have compared the G4s in these two messages in terms of nucleolin binding, nuclear mRNA retention, and mRNA translation inhibition and their effects on immune evasion. The G4s in the EBNA1 message are clustered in one repeat sequence and the G4 ligand PhenDH2 prevents all G4-associated activities. The RNA G4s in the LANAI message take part in similar multiple mRNA functions but are spread throughout the message. The different G4 activities depend on flanking coding and non-coding sequences and, interestingly, can be separated individually. Together, the results illustrate the multifunctional, dynamic and context-dependent nature of G4 RNAs and highlight the possibility to develop ligands targeting specific RNA G4 functions. The data also suggest a common multifunctional repertoire of viral G4 RNA activities for immune evasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据