4.7 Article

Influence of the polytetrafluoroethylene content on the performance of high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell electrodes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 41, 期 18, 页码 7475-7483

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.156

关键词

High-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell; Polytetrafluoroethylene content; Conductive atomic force microscopy; Membrane electrode assembly; Break-in behavior; Triton X-100

资金

  1. Impuls- und Vernetzungsfonds der Helmholtz Gesellschaft [VH-NG-616]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs), the properties of the catalyst layers (catalyst and binder materials) are critical for the performance of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs). Here we report the optimization of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) content in the catalyst layers in terms of the fuel cell performance. Investigations with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed fewer PTFE filaments in catalyst layers containing a lower amount of PTFE. Spatially resolved conductive atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed the higher electric conductivity of catalyst layers with reduced PTFE content. Ex-situ measurements indicated optimized phosphoric acid uptake of catalyst layers containing less PTFE. The PTFE content in the catalyst layers was found to have a large effect on the performance of MEAs in single cell experiments. Reduced PTFE content resulted in a decrease of the high frequency and charge-transfer resistance as well as an improved phosphoric acid uptake of the catalyst layers which resulted in enhanced fuel cell performance. The highest performance was obtained with catalyst layers containing 5% PTFE. The break-in behavior of the cells was significantly improved by addition of the non-ionic surfactant Triton X-100 to the catalyst layers. Copyright (C) 2016, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据