4.7 Article

Synthesis and properties of chitosan membranes modified by reactive cationic dyes as a novel alkaline exchange membrane for low temperature fuel cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 41, 期 40, 页码 18166-18177

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.069

关键词

Alkaline exchange membrane; Reactive cationic dyes; OH- conductivity; Alkaline resistance stability; Dyeing process

资金

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Research Foundation for Basic Research (Natural Science) [BK20131221]
  2. Industry-Academia -Research Joint Innovation Fund of Jiangsu Province [BY2015057-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using 1-aminoanthraquinone, cyanuric chloride, dimethyl propylene diamine, diethyl sulfate as reactants, a reactive cationic dye (RCD) was synthesized. Then the dye prepared was used to modify the pristine chitosan (CTS) membrane to synthesize a novel alkaline exchange membrane for low temperature fuel cells. The performance of the prepared membranes were researched in details. FTIR and SEM were used for chemical and structural characterization of the membranes while thermo gravimetric analysis was adopted to study the membranes' thermal stability. The properties of the membranes such as OH- conductivity (sigma), water uptake (WU), ion exchange capacity (IEC) and mechanical property were also investigated systematically to evaluate their application performances. The results showed that the OH- conductivity of the membrane (52 mu m) can reach 4.59 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) and increase with the temperature increasing from 30 degrees C to 80 degrees C. After immersing the CTS/RCD membrane (52 mu m) in the KOH solution (80 degrees C, 8 mol L-1) for 300 h, the OH- conductivity of the membrane didn't decrease, on the contrary, it increased to 1.057 x 10(-2) S cm(-1), which indicated that the membrane had the excellent stability to resist the strong alkaline lye. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据