4.7 Article

The impact of passive design strategies on cooling loads of buildings in temperate climate

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101588

关键词

Gaza; Passive design; IESve; Temperate climate; Thermal performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simulation-based study was conducted to examine the integration of passive design strategies in a generic residence to optimize thermal performance and minimize cooling loads. The findings show that implementing passive design parameters can reduce building energy consumption by 9.89 kW, representing 59% of total energy consumption. This integration could be significant in cities with limited natural resources and guide professionals towards the potential of passive measures in building design.
Residential and commercial buildings consume over a third of the world's total energy. The residential sector accounts for most energy use in the Gaza Strip, necessitating the development of feasible energy-saving techniques. Herein, a simulation-based study has been prepared to examine the integration of some practical passive design strategies into a generic residence. The study aims to optimize thermal performance by minimizing the building's cooling loads. A detailed examination is conducted for the literature on similar research and passive design techniques to investigate a city's state and climate. Three passive parameters, namely, shading devices, natural ventilation, and thermal insulation, were investigated using Climate Consultant and IESve as assessment software. Accordingly, their impacts on the building's indoor temperature and cooling load were evaluated. The findings suggest that the implementation of such passive design parameters can reduce energy consumption by 9.89 kW, representing 59% of the total energy consumption of the building. Such integration in residential buildings could be significant in cities with limited natural resources and would guide architects, designers, engineers towards the potential of passive measures in building design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据