4.6 Article

Priorities and preferences of advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients starting palliative chemotherapy: baseline results from the HOLISTIC study

期刊

ESMO OPEN
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100258

关键词

sarcoma; preferences; priorities; quality of life

类别

资金

  1. Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  2. Institute of Cancer Research, Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  3. Lilly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Palliative chemotherapy is the main treatment for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas, but prognosis remains limited. The HOLISTIC study conducted in the UK and the Netherlands found that there are diverse priorities and preferences among these patients, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment decisions. Taking individual differences into account during treatment discussions may improve communication and optimize patient-centered care.
Introduction: Palliative chemotherapy is the principal treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS); however prognosis is limited (median overall survival 12-19 months). In this setting, patient values and priorities are central to personalised treatment decisions. Patients and methods: The prospective HOLISTIC study was conducted in the UK and the Netherlands assessing health-related quality of life in STS patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. Participants completed a questionnaire before starting chemotherapy, including attitudes towards quality of life (QoL) versus length of life (LoL), decisional control preferences, and decisional conflict. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and preferences. Results: One hundred and thirty-seven patients with advanced STS participated (UK: n = 72, the Netherlands: n = 65). Median age was 62 (27-79) years. Preference for extended LoL (n = 66, 48%) was slightly more common than preference for QoL (n = 56, 41%); 12 patients (9%) valued LoL and QoL equally (missing: n = 3). Younger patients (age <40 years) prioritised LoL, whereas two-thirds of older patients (aged >= 65 years) felt that QoL was equally or more important than LoL (P = 0.020). Decisional conflict was most common in patients who prioritised QoL (P = 0.024). Most patients preferred an active (n = 45, 33%) or collaborative (n = 59, 44%) role in treatment decisions. Gender, performance status, and country were significantly associated with preferred role. Concordance between preferred and actual role in chemotherapy decision was high (n = 104, 76%). Conclusions: Heterogeneous priorities and preferences among advanced STS patients support personalised decisions about palliative treatment. Considering individual differences during treatment discussions may enhance communication and optimise patient-centred care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据