4.7 Article

A multi-factor evaluation method for the thermal runaway risk of lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103767

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Thermal runaway; Risk assessment; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874184, U20A20213]
  2. Key R&D programs (Social Development) in Jiangsu Province [BE2016771]
  3. Key Natural Science Foundation in Jiangsu Province [18KJA620003]
  4. Jiangsu Project Plan for Outstanding Talents Team in Six Research Fields [TD-XNYQC-002]
  5. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX20_1039]
  6. Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province [2021JDTD0030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper systematically established a multi-factor evaluation method for the thermal runaway risk of lithium-ion batteries using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Multiple factors were quantitatively evaluated and analyzed to determine evaluation weights and risk grade ranges. A case study showed that under abuse conditions, the thermal runaway risk from LIBs is level III, emphasizing the importance of protecting against gas explosions and the harm of JFHM.
To systematically and quantitatively establish a multi-factor evaluation method for the thermal runaway risk of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process was adopted in this paper. The own hazardous factor of battery, hazardous factor of vented gases, jet fire and high-temperature mixture (JFHM), ejected powder and their corresponding sub-factors were evaluated and analyzed. Combined with literature, the model of multifactor evaluation method was established and the index system was determined. The pair-wise comparison matrixes for the thermal runaway risk were drawn, the triangular fuzzy method was used to calculate and the evaluation weight was obtained. The factors' ranges of the criteria risk grades were quantitatively determined. The risk of thermal runaway consequences under the selected abuse condition was analyzed with a case study. The result shows that the thermal runaway risk from LIBs under the selected abuse condition is level III: the LIB is more dangerous after thermal runaway. Meanwhile, in this method, the lower explosion limit of gas and the maximum height/length of the JFHM are the two factors with the greatest weights. In the actual design and use process, people should pay attention to the protection of the runaway gas explosion and the harm of JFHM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据