4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of harmonic structure design with bimodal grain size distribution on near-threshold fatigue crack propagation in Ti-6Al-4V alloy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 616-622

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.02.038

关键词

Fatigue; Fracture mechanics; Titanium alloy; Crack closure; Grain refinement

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26289008, 15K05677] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) with a bimodal harmonic structure, which consists of a coarse-grained structure surrounded by a network structure of fine equiaxed grains, has been fabricated by sintering mechanically-milled powders to achieve high strength and good plasticity. To investigate the near threshold fatigue crack propagation in the harmonic structured Ti-6Al-4V alloy, K-decreasing tests are conducted on disk-shaped compact specimens (ASTM standard) under stress ratios.R from 0.1 to 0.8 with a constant-R loading regime in a laboratory atmosphere. The fracture surfaces are observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and crack profiles are analysed using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to discuss the mechanism of the fatigue crack propagation. The crack growth rates da/dN in the harmonic structured material are constantly higher than those in a material with coarse acicular microstructure under comparable stress intensity range Delta K, while the fatigue thresholds Delta K-th are lower. This is attributed to a decrease in the magnitude of roughness-induced crack closure and the effective stress intensity range Delta K-eff,K-th in the harmonic structured Ti-6Al-4V alloy due to the presence of fine grains. Furthermore, in some areas, fatigue cracks do not propagate in the coarse-grained structure with higher fatigue crack growth resistance, but they preferentially propagate across the network structure of fine grains in the harmonic structure. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据