4.4 Review

Stem cell therapy and diabetic erectile dysfunction: A critical review

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF STEM CELLS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 1549-1563

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i10.1549

关键词

Stem cells; Diabetes mellitus; Erectile dysfunction; Stem cell therapy; Diabetic erectile dysfunction

资金

  1. Mandate Research Grant from Universitas Airlangga [1408/UN3/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Erectile dysfunction is a common complication of diabetes mellitus, with about 67.4% of diabetic patients affected. The pathophysiological process involves endothelial and neurological factors, leading to damages in blood vessels and erectile tissue. Current treatments focus on symptom relief and the potential use of stem cells in treating ED is still mainly studied in experimental animals.
Erectile dysfunction (ED) has been identified as one of the most frequent chronic complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). The prevalence of ED is estimated to be about 67.4% in all DM cases worldwide. The pathophysiological process leading to ED involves endothelial, neurological, hormonal, and psychological factors. In DM, endothelial and neurological factors play a crucial role. Damages in the blood vessels and erectile tissue due to insulin resistance are the hallmark of ED in DM. The current treatments for ED include phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and penile prosthesis surgery. However, these treatments are limited in terms of just relieving the symptoms, but not resolving the cause of the problem. The use of stem cells for treating ED is currently being studied mostly in experimental animals. The stem cells used are derived from adipose tissue, bone, or human urine. Most of the studies observed an improvement in erectile quality in the experimental animals as well as an improvement in erectile tissue. However, research on stem cell therapy for ED in humans remains to be limited. Nevertheless, significant findings from studies using animal models indicate a potential use of stem cells in the treatment of ED.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据