4.8 Article

Atomistic Line Graph Neural Network for improved materials property predictions

期刊

NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-021-00650-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology
  2. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology [70NANB19H117]
  3. Frontera supercomputer, National Science Foundation at the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) at The University of Texas at Austin [OAC-1818253]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ALIGNN is a graph neural network architecture that explicitly and efficiently includes bond angle information in atomistic prediction tasks, leading to improved performance. The model performs well on multiple atomistic prediction tasks and has a competitive advantage in terms of speed.
Graph neural networks (GNN) have been shown to provide substantial performance improvements for atomistic material representation and modeling compared with descriptor-based machine learning models. While most existing GNN models for atomistic predictions are based on atomic distance information, they do not explicitly incorporate bond angles, which are critical for distinguishing many atomic structures. Furthermore, many material properties are known to be sensitive to slight changes in bond angles. We present an Atomistic Line Graph Neural Network (ALIGNN), a GNN architecture that performs message passing on both the interatomic bond graph and its line graph corresponding to bond angles. We demonstrate that angle information can be explicitly and efficiently included, leading to improved performance on multiple atomistic prediction tasks. We ALIGNN models for predicting 52 solid-state and molecular properties available in the JARVIS-DFT, Materials project, and QM9 databases. ALIGNN can outperform some previously reported GNN models on atomistic prediction tasks by up to 85% in accuracy with better or comparable model training speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据