4.8 Article

Highly mobile hot holes in Cs2AgBiBr6 double perovskite

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 52, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abj9066

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [12O3719N, S002019N]
  3. KU Leuven (KUL) [STG/21/010]
  4. EU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme [811284]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals enhanced hot carrier mobility in Cs2AgBiBr6 double perovskite, with hot carriers showing up to fourfold enhancement compared to cold carriers and capable of long-range hot carrier transport. Evidence suggests that the enhanced conductivity primarily comes from hot holes with reduced momentum scattering in Cs2AgBiBr6. The findings suggest Cs2AgBiBr6 as a promising platform for studying hot carrier transport fundamentals and developing hot carrier-based optoelectronic devices.
Highly mobile hot charge carriers are a prerequisite for efficient hot carrier optoelectronics requiring long-range hot carrier transport. However, hot carriers are typically much less mobile than cold ones because of carrier-phonon scattering. Here, we report enhanced hot carrier mobility in Cs2AgBiBr6 double perovskite. Following photoexcitation, hot carriers generated with excess energy exhibit boosted mobility, reaching an up to fourfold enhancement compared to cold carriers and a long-range hot carrier transport length beyond 200 nm. By optical pump-infrared push-terahertz probe spectroscopy and frequency-resolved photoconductivity measurements, we provide evidence that the conductivity enhancement originates primarily from hot holes with reduced momentum scattering. We rationalize our observation by considering (quasi-)ballistic transport of thermalized hot holes with energies above an energetic threshold in Cs2AgBiBr6. Our findings render Cs2AgBiBr6 as a fascinating platform for studying the fundamentals of hot carrier transport and its exploitation toward hot carrier-based optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据