4.6 Article

Nodal Recurrence in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-A Rare Event

期刊

JAMA ONCOLOGY
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 1851-1855

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4394

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined nodal recurrence rates in patients with clinically node-positive cancer treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, showing low rates of axillary failure at a median follow-up of 40 months, supporting potential omission of axillary lymph node dissection in patients achieving nodal pathologic complete response with SLNB alone.
IMPORTANCE Prospective trials have demonstrated sentinel lymph node (SLN) false-negative rates of less than 10% when 3 or more SLNs are retrieved in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer rendered clinically node-negative with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, rates of nodal recurrence in such patients treated with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone are unknown because axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in all patients, limiting adoption of this approach. OBJECTIVE To evaluate nodal recurrence rates in a consecutive cohort of patients with clinically node-positive (cN1) breast cancer receiving NAC, followed by a negative SLNB using a standardized technique, and no further axillary surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From November 2013 to February 2019, a cohort of consecutively identified patients with cT1 to cT3 biopsy-proven N1 breast cancer rendered cN0 by NAC underwent SLNB with dual tracer mapping and omission of ALND if 3 or more SLNs were identified and all were pathologically negative. Metastatic nodes were not routinely clipped, and localization of clipped nodes was not performed. The study was performed in a single tertiary cancer center. INTERVENTION Omission of ALND in patients with cN1 breast cancer after NAC if 3 or more SLNs were pathologically negative. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the rate of nodal recurrence among patients with cN1 breast cancer treated with SLNB alone after NAC. RESULTS Of 610 patients with cN1 breast cancer treated with NAC (median [IQR] age, 49 [40-58] years), 555 (91%) converted to cN0 and underwent SLNB; 234 (42%) had 3 or more negative SLNs and had SLNB alone. Median age was 49 years. Median tumor size was 3 cm; 144 (62%) were ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive, and 43 (18%) were triple negative. Most (212 [91%]) received doxorubicin-based NAC, 205 (88%) received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), and 164 (70%) also received nodal RT. At a median follow-up of 40 months, there was 1 axillary nodal recurrence synchronous with local recurrence in a patient who refused RT. Among patients who received RT (n = 205), there were no nodal recurrences. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that in patients with cN1 disease rendered cN0 with NAC, with 3 or more negative SLNs with SLNB alone, nodal recurrence rates were low, without routine nodal clipping. These findings potentially support omitting ALND in such patients. This cohort study examines nodal recurrence rates in patients with clinically node-positive cancer treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Question What is the nodal recurrence rate in patients with clinically node-positive (cN1) breast cancer treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)? Findings In this cohort study of 610 patients with cN1 breast cancer, among 234 consecutive patients whose cancer was rendered cN0 with NAC treated with SLNB alone with 3 or more negative SLNs retrieved, rates of axillary failure at a median follow-up of 40 months were low (0.4%), without routine nodal clipping. Meaning These data support potential omission of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with cN1 breast cancer who achieve nodal pathologic complete response with NAC and are treated with SLNB alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据