Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation for Lung Cancer Screening
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation for Lung Cancer Screening
作者
关键词
-
出版物
JAMA Oncology
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 1833
出版商
American Medical Association (AMA)
发表日期
2021-10-22
DOI
10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4942
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Cost-Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Interventions in the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: A Simulation Study
- (2021) Christopher J Cadham et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Potential Disparities by Sex and Race-ethnicity in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Rates
- (2021) Paul F. Pinsky et al. CHEST
- Screening for Lung Cancer
- (2021) et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography
- (2021) Rafael Meza et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Disparities of national lung cancer screening guidelines in the U.S. population
- (2020) Summer S Han et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Screening for Lung Cancer — 10 States, 2017
- (2020) Thomas B. Richards et al. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT
- Screening Adherence in the Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project
- (2020) Nichole T. Tanner et al. CHEST
- Potential Impact of Cessation Interventions at the Point of Lung Cancer Screening on Lung Cancer and Overall Mortality in the United States
- (2020) Pianpian Cao et al. Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Addressing Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Healthcare Access. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement
- (2020) M. Patricia Rivera et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Lung Cancer Screening Uptake: Analysis of BRFSS 2018
- (2020) Dustin Kee et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Treatment capacity required for full-scale implementation of lung cancer screening in the United States
- (2019) Erik F. Blom et al. CANCER
- Evaluation of USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines Among African American Adult Smokers
- (2019) Melinda C. Aldrich et al. JAMA Oncology
- Lung Cancer Screening Utilization: A Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Analysis
- (2019) Whitney E. Zahnd et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
- (2019) Steven D. Criss et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Smoking and Lung Cancer Mortality in the United States From 2015 to 2065
- (2018) Jihyoun Jeon et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- ADHERENCE TO ANNUAL LUNG CANCER SCREENING WITHIN THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION LUNG CANCER SCREENING DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
- (2018) PAUL BRASHER et al. CHEST
- Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada
- (2017) Kevin ten Haaf et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Development and Validation of Risk Models to Select Ever-Smokers for CT Lung Cancer Screening
- (2016) Hormuzd A. Katki et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation—outcomes and cost-effectiveness
- (2016) John R. Goffin et al. LUNG CANCER
- Catalog and Comparison of Societal Preferences (Utilities) for Lung Cancer Health States
- (2015) Angela C. Tramontano et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada
- (2015) John R. Goffin et al. JAMA Oncology
- Patterns of Birth Cohort–Specific Smoking Histories, 1965–2009
- (2014) Theodore R. Holford et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Comparative analysis of 5 lung cancer natural history and screening models that reproduce outcomes of the NLST and PLCO trials
- (2014) Rafael Meza et al. CANCER
- Lung Cancer Detectability by Test, Histology, Stage, and Gender: Estimates from the NLST and the PLCO Trials
- (2014) K. ten Haaf et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Tobacco Control and the Reduction in Smoking-Related Premature Deaths in the United States, 1964-2012
- (2014) Theodore R. Holford et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Cost-Effectiveness of CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial
- (2014) William C. Black et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Updating Cost-Effectiveness — The Curious Resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY Threshold
- (2014) Peter J. Neumann et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Comparing Benefits from Many Possible Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Programs: Extrapolating from the National Lung Screening Trial Using Comparative Modeling
- (2014) Pamela M. McMahon et al. PLoS One
- Benefits and Harms of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Strategies: A Comparative Modeling Study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- (2013) Harry J. de Koning et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- (2013) Virginia A. Moyer ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Comparing the benefits of screening for breast cancer and lung cancer using a novel natural history model
- (2011) Ray S. Lin et al. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
- Longitudinal predictors of adherence to annual follow-up in a lung cancer screening programme
- (2011) Kimberly A Wildstein et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer in the United States
- (2011) Pamela M. McMahon et al. Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Low-dose lung computed tomography screening before age 55: estimates of the mortality reduction required to outweigh the radiation-induced cancer risk
- (2008) Amy Berrington de González et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started