4.6 Article

Surface Redox Pseudocapacitance of Partially Oxidized Titanium Carbide MXene in Water-in-Salt Electrolyte

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 30-35

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02262

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]
  3. US DOE Office of Science Facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]
  4. Cotswold Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports that partial oxidation of MXene can enhance the pseudocapacitive intercalation of Li+ ions and demonstrates the possibility of tuning pseudocapacitive intercalation by adjusting the initial oxidation state of the transition metal on MXene.
Achieving pseudocapacitive intercalation in MXenes with neutral aqueous electrolytes and driving reversible redox reactions is scientifically appealing and practically useful. Here, we report that the partial oxidation of MXene intensifies pseudocapacitive Li+ intercalation into Ti3C2Tx MXene from neutral water-in-salt electrolytes. An in situ X-ray absorption near-edge structure analysis shows that the Ti oxidation state changes during the Li+ intercalation, indicating the presence of a surface redox reaction. The Ti oxidation/reduction is further confirmed by an in situ extended X-ray absorption fine structure analysis, which shows a reversible contraction/expansion of the Ti-C interatomic distance. The intensified Li+ pseudocapacitive intercalation can be explained by the higher oxidation state of Ti at the open circuit potential. This work demonstrates the possibility of tuning the pseudocapacitive intercalation by adjusting the initial oxidation state of the transition metal on the MXene and offers a facile way to enhance the pseudocapacitance of various MXenes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据