4.5 Article

Positive Predictive Value of COVID-19 ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes Across Calendar Time and Clinical Setting

期刊

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 1011-1018

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S335621

关键词

SARS CoV-2; validation; administrative codes; electronic health records

资金

  1. VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) [VA HSR RES 13-457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD-10 code U07.1 for COVID-19 virus in the Department of Veterans of Affairs. The overall PPV was 84.2%, with variations across clinical settings and quarters. The most common reasons for false positive records were history of COVID-19 and laboratory test orders.
Purpose: To estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code U07.1, COVID-19 virus identified, in the Department of Veterans of Affairs (VA). Patients and Methods: Records of ICD-10 code U07.1 from inpatient, outpatient, and emergency/urgent care settings were extracted from VA medical record data from 4/01/2020 to 3/31/2021. A weighted, random sample of 1500 records from each quarter of the one-year observation period was reviewed by study personnel to confirm active COVID-19 infection at the time of diagnosis and classify reasons for false positive records. PPV was estimated overall and compared across clinical setting and quarters. Results: We identified 664,406 records of U07.1. Among the 1500 reviewed, 237 were false positives (PPV: 84.2%, 95% CI: 82.4-86.0). PPV ranged from 77.7% in outpatient settings to 93.8% in inpatient settings and was 83.3% in quarter 1, 80.5% in quarter 2, 86.1% in quarter 3, and 83.6% in quarter 4. The most common reasons for false positive records were history of COVID-19 (44.3%) and orders for laboratory tests (21.5%). Conclusion: The PPV of ICD-10 code U07.1 is low, especially in outpatient settings. Directed training may improve accuracy of coding to levels that are deemed adequate for future use in surveillance efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据