4.6 Article

SIGNGD with Error Feedback Meets Lazily Aggregated Technique: Communication-Efficient Algorithms for Distributed Learning

期刊

TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 174-185

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.26599/TST.2021.9010045

关键词

distributed learning; communication-efficient algorithm; convergence analysis

资金

  1. Core Electronic Devices, High-End Generic Chips, and Basic Software Major Special Projects [2018ZX01028101]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61907034, 61932001, 61906200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper designs two communication-efficient algorithms, EF-SIGNGD and LE-SIGNGD, for distributed learning tasks. EF-SIGNGD uses 1-bit gradient quantization and error feedback technique, while LE-SIGNGD introduces a well-designed lazy gradient aggregation rule. Both algorithms demonstrate good performance in experiments.
The proliferation of massive datasets has led to significant interests in distributed algorithms for solving large-scale machine learning problems. However, the communication overhead is a major bottleneck that hampers the scalability of distributed machine learning systems. In this paper, we design two communication-efficient algorithms for distributed learning tasks. The first one is named EF-SIGNGD, in which we use the 1-bit (sign-based) gradient quantization method to save the communication bits. Moreover, the error feedback technique, i.e., incorporating the error made by the compression operator into the next step, is employed for the convergence guarantee. The second algorithm is called LE-SIGNGD, in which we introduce a well-designed lazy gradient aggregation rule to EF-SIGNG D that can detect the gradients with small changes and reuse the outdated information. LE-SIGNG D saves communication costs both in transmitted bits and communication rounds. Furthermore, we show that LE-SIGNGD is convergent under some mild assumptions. The effectiveness of the two proposed algorithms is demonstrated through experiments on both real and synthetic data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据