4.7 Article

Permittivity, loss factor and Cole-Cole model of acrylic materials for dielectric elastomers

期刊

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104781

关键词

Dielectric elastomer; Model; VHB; Permittivity

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [202006280409]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dielectric properties of VHB4905 and VHB4910 were systematically measured and analyzed, revealing their sensitivity to frequency dependence and the effects of microstructure. High frequency orientation movement of polar groups was found to decrease the dielectric constant, while fitting correlation coefficients were high, providing insight for the design and control of dielectric elastomer actuators.
In this study, the dielectric constants of VHB4905 and VHB4910 are measured systematically, and the capacitance, edge capacitance, dielectric loss and dielectric loss factor are analyzed. The dielectric properties are revealed from the microstructure, and the Cole-Cole model is used to characterize the dielectric properties. The results show that the dielectric constant is very sensitive to the frequency dependence, but it is sensitive to the real and imaginary parts from 10(2) Hz to 10(6) Hz. The relative errors of their permittivity are small, when the edge effect is not taken into account. At high frequency, the orientation movement of the polar group on the side chain of VHB acrylic leads to the decrease of the molecular polarizability, and the energy consumption of electric dipole, shift polarization and turn polarization leads to the decrease of the dielectric constant and the increase of the dielectric loss. The fitting correlation coefficients of dielectric constant for VHB4905 and VHB4910 are high, which describe the polarization relaxation behavior of VHB acrylic acid. The research in this paper is helpful to understand the electrical characteristics of acrylic acid, and provides a basis for the design and control of dielectric elastomer actuator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据