4.5 Article

A Novel Classification Method for Pores in Laser Powder Bed Fusion

期刊

METALS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11121912

关键词

laser powder bed fusion; AlSi10Mg; computed tomography; finite element analysis; novel pore classification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigates the classification and analysis of pores in aluminum alloy parts using X-ray tomography, with further examination of the relationship between pore characteristics and stress concentration through finite element analysis and fracture mechanics tests. The result is a novel pore classification method that can be applied for process adjustments and quality assurance in additive manufacturing using laser powder bed fusion.
Nowadays, additive manufacturing (AM) using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is acknowledged for its ability to generate near-net-shape components for various industries such as aerospace, automotive, and health industries. However, internal defects seem to be the inevitable concomitant in the current state of laser powder bed fusion of Al alloys. Hence, knowledge of the formation, different types, and morphologies of pores and their suppression is an essential element for successful future AM applications. The purpose of this research is to qualify a new approach of defect classification using X-ray tomography. In this framework, this research examined the influence of size, shape, and location of pores on crack initiation for AlSi10Mg parts produced by LPBF. For this reason, a total number of 39,228 pores detected in a cylindrical sample were categorised. Additionally, 26 selected pores of different morphology from the X-ray scan were analysed by means of finite element analysis (FEA). Moreover, fracture mechanics determinations were carried out to examine the correlations between pore characteristics and degree of stress concentration. The result is an evaluated novel pore classification method that can be used for process adjustments, quality assurance, as well as further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据