4.6 Article

Early Prognostics of Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Health

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14042313

关键词

lithium-ion battery pack; state of health; health indicators; fusion model; Gaussian process regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a method for predicting the future health of a lithium-ion battery pack based on the aging data of the battery cells and early cycling data of the pack. It constructs degradation models of health indicators and uses a data-driven model to predict the health of the pack. Experimental results validate the satisfactory accuracy of the proposed method.
Accurate health prognostics of lithium-ion battery packs play a crucial role in timely maintenance and avoiding potential safety accidents in energy storage. To rapidly evaluate the health of newly developed battery packs, a method for predicting the future health of the battery pack using the aging data of the battery cells for their entire lifecycles and with the early cycling data of the battery pack is proposed. Firstly, health indicators (HIs) are extracted from the experimental data, and high correlations between the extracted HIs and the capacity are verified by the Pearson correlation analysis method. To predict the future health of the battery pack based on the HIs, degradation models of HIs are constructed by using an exponential function, long short-term memory network, and their weighted fusion. The future HIs of the battery pack are predicted according to the fusion degradation model. Then, based on the Gaussian process regression algorithm and battery pack data, a data-driven model is constructed to predict the health of the battery pack. Finally, the proposed method is validated with a series-connected battery pack with fifteen 100 Ah lithium iron phosphate battery cells. The mean absolute error and root mean square error of the health prediction of the battery pack are 7.17% and 7.81%, respectively, indicating that the proposed method has satisfactory accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据