4.1 Article

Study on the Physical Properties and Joint Evolution Characteristics of Three-Dimensional Reconstructed Coal

期刊

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/7038110

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52074166, 5177419]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020T130385]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2021YQ38]
  4. Climbing Project of Taishan Scholar in Shandong Province [TSPD20210313]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that the size and area of joints inside the coal body are closely related to the compressive strength of the coal sample, and increasing the joint size and area can increase the ductility and multipeak phenomenon of the stress-strain curve of the coal sample.
There are various complex joints (fissures), laminae, and other soft structural surfaces in the roadway enclosure, and the existence of these soft structural surfaces seriously affects the stability of the roadway enclosure. In order to study the mechanical properties of the coal body and the development of joints during coal fracture, this paper establishes a three-dimensional model of the fracture structure of the coal body based on CT scanning and three-dimensional reconstruction technology. On this basis, a 3D numerical model of the equivalent nodal coal body is constructed, uniaxial compression simulation analysis is performed, and the joint evolution development law of the coal sample is studied by the built-in joint monitoring program of PFC3D. The results show that the larger the effective joint area and larger the joint size inside the coal sample, the smaller the compressive strength of the coal sample. The increase of joint size and joint surface area increased the ductility and stress-strain curve multipeak phenomenon of the coal sample to some extent. During the rupture of the coal sample, the changes of each phase of the statistical curve of joint number and the phases of the stress-strain curve of the coal sample are compatible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据