4.7 Article

Blind Fusion of Hyperspectral Multispectral Images Based on Matrix Factorization

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13214219

关键词

hyperspectral imaging super-resolution; image fusion; matrix factorization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91948303-1, 61803375, 12002380, 62106278, 62101575, 61906210]
  2. National University of Defense Technology Foundation [ZK20-52]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposed a method to estimate the spectral response function from images for blind fusion, aiming to overcome the dependence of fusion methods on the point spread function. Experimental results showed significant improvements in the quality of fusion results using the proposed method compared to other blind fusion methods.
The fusion of low spatial resolution hyperspectral images and high spatial resolution multispectral images in the same scenario is important for the super-resolution of hyperspectral images. The spectral response function (SRF) and the point spread function (PSF) are two crucial prior pieces of information in fusion, and most of the current algorithms need to provide these two preliminary pieces of information in advance, even for semi-blind fusion algorithms at least the SRF. This causes limitations in the application of fusion algorithms. This paper aims to solve the dependence of the fusion method on the point spread function and proposes a method to estimate the spectral response function from the images involved in the fusion to achieve blind fusion. We conducted experiments on simulated datasets Pavia University, CAVE, and the remote sensing images acquired by two spectral cameras, Sentinel 2 and Hyperion. The experimental results show that our proposed SRF estimation method can improve the PSNR value by 5 dB on average compared with other state-of-the-art SRF estimation results. The proposed blind fusion method can improve the PSNR value of fusion results by 3-15 dB compared with other blind fusion methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据