4.7 Article

Application of Box-Behnken design for optimization and development of quetiapine fumarate loaded chitosan nanoparticles for brain delivery via intranasal route

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.076

关键词

Quetiapine; Chitosan nanoparticles; Nose to brain delivery

资金

  1. Lady Tata Memorial Trust (Bombay, India)
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Delhi, India [IFA-LSBM-13]
  3. Govt. of Gujarat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present investigation was to optimize and develop quetiapine fumarate (QF) loaded chitosan nanoparticles (QF-NP) by ionic gelation method using Box-Behnken design. Three independent variables viz., X-1-Concentration of chitosan, X-2-Concentration of sodium tripolyphosphate and X-3-Volume of sodium tripolyphosphate were taken to investigate their effect on dependent variables (Y-1-Size, Y-2-PDI and Y-3-%EE). Optimized formula of QF-NP was selected from the design space which was further evaluated for physicochemical, morphological, solid state characterization, nasal diffusion and in-vivo distribution for brain targeting following non-invasive intranasal administration. The average particle size, PDI, %EE and nasal diffusion were found to be 131.08 +/- 7.45 nm, 0.252 +/- 1 0.064, 89.93 +/- 3.85% and 65.24 +/- 15.26% respectively. Neither toxicity nor structural damage on nasal mucosa was observed upon histopathological examination. Significantly higher brain/blood ratio and 2 folds higher nasal bioavailability in brain with QF-NP in comparison to drug solution following intranasal administration revealed preferential nose to brain transport bypassing blood-brain barrier and prolonged retention of QF at site of action suggesting superiority of chitosan as permeability enhancer. Overall, the above finding shows promising results in the area of developing non-invasive intranasal route as an alternative to oral route for brain delivery. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据