The impact of removing financial incentives and/or audit and feedback on chlamydia testing in general practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial (ACCEPt-able)
出版年份 2022 全文链接
标题
The impact of removing financial incentives and/or audit and feedback on chlamydia testing in general practice: A cluster randomised controlled trial (ACCEPt-able)
作者
关键词
Chlamydia, Health economics, Finance, Randomized controlled trials, Primary care, Age groups, Quality of care, General practitioners
出版物
PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages e1003858
出版商
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
发表日期
2022-01-05
DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1003858
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- The impact of practice size and ownership on general practice care in Australia
- (2021) Caroline Moel-Mandel et al. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
- Details matter: predicting when nudging clinicians will succeed or fail
- (2020) Craig R Fox et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ‘It Opened My Eyes’—examining the impact of a multifaceted chlamydia testing intervention on general practitioners using Normalization Process Theory
- (2018) Anna Yeung et al. FAMILY PRACTICE
- Quality of Care in the United Kingdom after Removal of Financial Incentives
- (2018) Mark Minchin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Population effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia testing in primary care in Australia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
- (2018) Jane S Hocking et al. LANCET
- Ten tips for advancing a culture of improvement in primary care
- (2018) Tara Kiran et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Effects of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care 12 Months After Stopping Interventions
- (2017) Jeffrey A. Linder et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Safer Prescribing — A Trial of Education, Informatics, and Financial Incentives
- (2016) Tobias Dreischulte et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol
- (2015) Jane S. Hocking et al. Implementation Science
- Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: impact of implementing government proposals
- (2014) Michael Caley et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Durability of Benefits of an Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention After Discontinuation of Audit and Feedback
- (2014) Jeffrey S. Gerber et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Growing Literature, Stagnant Science? Systematic Review, Meta-Regression and Cumulative Analysis of Audit and Feedback Interventions in Health Care
- (2014) Noah M. Ivers et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Withdrawing performance indicators: retrospective analysis of general practice performance under UK Quality and Outcomes Framework
- (2014) E. Kontopantelis et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- An Examination of Pay-for-Performance in General Practice in Australia
- (2013) Jessica Greene HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Kill the QOF
- (2013) D. Spence BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The Quality and Outcomes Framework--where next?
- (2013) S. Gillam et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Pay for Performance in Health Care
- (2012) Frank Eijkenaar MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
- When financial incentives do more good than harm: a checklist
- (2012) P. P. Glasziou et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
- (2012) M. K. Campbell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions
- (2010) Elizabeth Murray et al. BMC Medicine
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started