4.5 Article

Inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide for the treatment of covid-19 in adult outpatients: CONTAIN phase II randomised controlled trial

期刊

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 375, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068060

关键词

-

资金

  1. McGill University Health Centre Foundation
  2. McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to determine if inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide were better than placebo in reducing respiratory symptoms in adult outpatients with covid-19. Results showed that there were no significant differences in symptom resolution between the intervention group receiving ciclesonide and the control group.
OBJECTIVE To determine if inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide are superior to placebo at decreasing respiratory symptoms in adult outpatients with covid-19. DESIGN Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. SETTING Three Canadian provinces (Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia). PARTICIPANTS 203 adults aged 18 years and older with polymerase chain reaction confirmed covid-19, presenting with fever, cough, or dyspnoea. INTERVENTION Participants were randomised to receive either inhaled ciclesonide (600 mu g twice daily) and intranasal ciclesonide (200 mu g daily) or metered dose inhaler and nasal saline placebos for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was symptom resolution at day 7. Analyses were conducted on the modified intention-to-treat population (participants who took at least one dose of study drug and completed one follow-up survey) and adjusted for stratified randomisation by sex. RESULTS The modified intention-to-treat population included 203 participants: 105 were randomly assigned to ciclesonide (excluding two dropouts and one loss to follow-up) and 98 to placebo (excluding three dropouts and six losses to follow-up). The median age was 35 years (interquartile range 27-47 years) and 54% were women. The proportion of participants with resolution of symptoms by day 7 did not differ significantly between the intervention group (42/105, 40%) and control group (34/98, 35%); absolute adjusted risk difference 5.5% (95% confidence interval -7.8% to 18.8%). Results might be limited to the population studied, which mainly included younger adults without comorbidities. The trial was stopped early, therefore could have been underpowered. CONCLUSION Compared with placebo, the combination of inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide did not show a statistically significant increase in resolution of symptoms among healthier young adults with covid-19 presenting with prominent respiratory symptoms. As evidence is insufficient to determine the benefit of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of covid-19, further research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04435795.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据