4.7 Article

Gene-corrected p.A30P SNCA patient-derived isogenic neurons rescue neuronal branching and function

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01505-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fond National de Recherche within the PEARL programme [FNR/P13/6682797]
  2. INTER programme [INTER/LEIR/18/12719318]
  3. National Centre for Excellence in Research on Parkinson's disease (NCER-PD) programme
  4. European Union [692320]
  5. FG-funded NGS Competence Center Tubingen Germany [INST 37/1049-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study assessed the functional impact of the p.A30P SNCA mutation on dopaminergic neurons derived from a Parkinson's disease patient. Various impairments in neuronal function were identified, providing insights for potential disease-modifying compound screenings and drug discovery strategies in the future.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterised by the degeneration of A9 dopaminergic neurons and the pathological accumulation of alpha-synuclein. The p.A30P SNCA mutation generates the pathogenic form of the alpha-synuclein protein causing an autosomal-dominant form of PD. There are limited studies assessing pathogenic SNCA mutations in patient-derived isogenic cell models. Here we provide a functional assessment of dopaminergic neurons derived from a patient harbouring the p.A30P SNCA mutation. Using two clonal gene-corrected isogenic cell lines we identified image-based phenotypes showing impaired neuritic processes. The pathological neurons displayed impaired neuronal activity, reduced mitochondrial respiration, an energy deficit, vulnerability to rotenone, and transcriptional alterations in lipid metabolism. Our data describes for the first time the mutation-only effect of the p.A30P SNCA mutation on neuronal function, supporting the use of isogenic cell lines in identifying image-based pathological phenotypes that can serve as an entry point for future disease-modifying compound screenings and drug discovery strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据