4.7 Article

Long-Term Space Nutrition: A Scoping Review

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14010194

关键词

long-term space tasks; astronauts; dietary deficiencies; adverse living environment; nutritional strategies; fresh food; self-sufficient; microgravity; space nutrition; space food systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This scoping review identified current evidence and gaps in the field of long-term space nutrition. It suggests that effective dietary measures and sustainable food production systems can address the nutritional needs of astronauts during long-term space missions.
This scoping review aimed to identify current evidence and gaps in the field of long-term space nutrition. Specifically, the review targeted critical nutritional needs during long-term manned missions in outer space in addition to the essential components of a sustainable space nutrition system for meeting these needs. The search phrase space food and the survival of astronauts in long-term missions was used to collect the initial 5432 articles from seven Chinese and seven English databases. From these articles, two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts to identify 218 articles for full-text reviews based on three themes and 18 keyword combinations as eligibility criteria. The results suggest that it is possible to address short-term adverse environmental factors and nutritional deficiencies by adopting effective dietary measures, selecting the right types of foods and supplements, and engaging in specific sustainable food production and eating practices. However, to support self-sufficiency during long-term space exploration, the most optimal and sustainable space nutrition systems are likely to be supported primarily by fresh food production, natural unprocessed foods as diets, nutrient recycling of food scraps and cultivation systems, and the establishment of closed-loop biospheres or landscape-based space habitats as long-term life support systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据