4.6 Article

Requirements for Processing High-Strength AlZnMgCu Alloys with PBF-LB/M to Achieve Crack-Free and Dense Parts

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14237190

关键词

grain refinement; crack reduction; laser beam melting; aluminum alloy; titanium carbide; nanoparticle; PBF-LB; M

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to improve the hot cracking issues of aluminum alloy 7075 during PBF-LB/M process by adding titanium carbide nanoparticles as nucleating agents, which resulted in refined microstructure and crack-free samples with high strength. The two-step ageing heat treatment further enhanced the ultimate tensile strengths and elongation at break. Additionally, it was found that not all nanoparticles used remained in the melt pool during PBF-LB/M process.
Processing aluminum alloys employing powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) is becoming more attractive for the industry, especially if lightweight applications are needed. Unfortunately, high-strength aluminum alloys such as AA7075 are prone to hot cracking during PBF-LB/M, as well as welding. Both a large solidification range promoted by the alloying elements zinc and copper and a high thermal gradient accompanied with the manufacturing process conditions lead to or favor hot cracking. In the present study, a simple method for modifying the powder surface with titanium carbide nanoparticles (NPs) as a nucleating agent is aimed. The effect on the microstructure with different amounts of the nucleating agent is shown. For the aluminum alloy 7075 with 2.5 ma% titanium carbide nanoparticles, manufactured via PBF-LB/M, crack-free samples with a refined microstructure having no discernible melt pool boundaries and columnar grains are observed. After using a two-step ageing heat treatment, ultimate tensile strengths up to 465 MPa and an 8.9% elongation at break are achieved. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that not all nanoparticles used remain in the melt pool during PBF-LB/M.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据