4.6 Article

The Effectiveness of Liquid PUD-TiO2 Photocatalyst on Asphalt Pavement

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 14, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14247805

关键词

asphalt mixture; nitrogen oxides; photocatalyst; photocatalytic reaction; PUD-TiO2

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [21TSRD-B151228-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully reduced the emission of NOX by applying a new TiO2 photocatalyst on asphalt roads, and found that liquid PUD-TiO2 had no effect on the performance of asphalt pavement, mainly influenced by humidity under different weather conditions.
Harmful nitrogen oxides (NOX) are produced by vehicles, factories, mines, and power plants. In fact, over one million tons of NOX are emitted into the atmosphere every year, making it the most prevalent air pollutant. Approximately 45% of the emitted NOX in Korea is associated with the transportation sector. In this paper, the application of a new TiO2 photocatalyst on the asphalt roads to remove combustion-produced NOX was studied. In an effort to overcome the known constructability, adhesion, cost, and dispersion problems associated with TiO2 photocatalysts, the liquid polyurethane (PUD) was added with TiO2 to form a mixture later known as liquid PUD-TiO2. Laboratory and field tests were conducted to determine the optimum amount of photocatalyst to be used and the performance of asphalt pavement coated with PUD-TiO2 in terms of indirect tensile strength, water susceptibility, and rutting resistance. Additionally, the performance of PUD-TiO2 under different humidity, wind speed, and temperature conditions was also evaluated. The results showed that the application of PUD-TiO2 photocatalyst on the asphalt pavements road reduces the NOX available on the surface of the road. The PUD-TiO2 also was found to have no effects on the performance of asphalt pavement. Meanwhile, under different weather conditions, the reaction between the photocatalyst and NOX is mainly affected by the humidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据