4.8 Article

In vivo structure and dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25999-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Projects [2018ZX10305410]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0900801]
  3. Wellcome grant [207507]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the dynamics and interactions of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, which play crucial roles in viral replication, transcription, and translation, providing important insights for developing better antiviral strategies.
The dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 RNA structure and their functional relevance are largely unknown. Here we develop a simplified SPLASH assay and comprehensively map the in vivo RNA-RNA interactome of SARS-CoV-2 genome across viral life cycle. We report canonical and alternative structures including 5 '-UTR and 3 '-UTR, frameshifting element (FSE) pseudoknot and genome cyclization in both cells and virions. We provide direct evidence of interactions between Transcription Regulating Sequences, which facilitate discontinuous transcription. In addition, we reveal alternative short and long distance arches around FSE. More importantly, we find that within virions, while SARS-CoV-2 genome RNA undergoes intensive compaction, genome domains remain stable but with strengthened demarcation of local domains and weakened global cyclization. Taken together, our analysis reveals the structural basis for the regulation of replication, discontinuous transcription and translational frameshifting, the alternative conformations and the maintenance of global genome organization during the whole life cycle of SARS-CoV-2, which we anticipate will help develop better antiviral strategies. RNA secondary structure is important for viral replication, transcription and translation. Here the authors employ SPLASH method and map in vivo RNA interactions and dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome in different viral life cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据