4.6 Article

Use of pure and mixed culture of diazinon-degrading Streptomyces to remove other organophosphorus pesticides

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.06.018

关键词

Chlorpyrifos; Mixed cultures; Organophosphorus hydrolase; Streptomyces spp.; Removal

资金

  1. FONDECYT Initiation Project [11130716]
  2. CONICYT/MINCYT Program of Scientific International Cooperation [PCCI140056]
  3. CONICYT/FONDAP Project [15130015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorpyrifos (CP) is an organophosphorus pesticide (OP) widely used in agriculture. Evidence of CP residues in soil, water and food has generated an urgent need to develop treatment systems that avoid possible damage to human health and the environment. In this study, eight diazinon-degrading Streptomyces strains were evaluated for their ability to remove CP as the only carbon source from a liquid medium. Single cultures removed 32-74% of CP, and most of the strains incremented their biomass. Additionally, changes in the protein profile were found. Protein extract analyses demonstrated that four organisms exhibited the enzyme organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH); therefore, the Streptomyces spp. AC5, AC9, GA11 and ISP13 strains were used as a mixed culture to study the removal of CP and their main metabolite 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP). Our results showed a CP removal rate of 0.019-0.034 h(-1) a half-life of 20-36 h and a maximum TCP concentration of 0.32 mg L-1. The mixed culture used TCP to grow, and up to 58% was removed from the medium. Glucose addition decreased biomass duplication time of the culture and also accelerated pesticide depletion from the medium. Viability analysis showed that after CP and TCP exposure, over 78% of the cells survived. Finally, the mixed culture of Streptomyces spp. can simultaneously remove four OPs, reaching a maximum removal of 693% and 33.6% for thiophosphotriester and phosphorothiolester compounds respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据