4.7 Review

Biomarkers in the diagnosis of wounds infection: An analytical perspective

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116405

关键词

Biomarkers; Wounds; Infection; Analytical methods

资金

  1. FCT/MCTES through national funds [UID/QUI/50006/2019]
  2. European Union (FEDER funds through the Operational Competitiveness Program (COMPETE)) [POCI-010145-FEDER 030163eProject]
  3. REQUIMTE
  4. FCT (Fundacao para a Ci<^>encia e Tecnologia) [PTDC/QUI-QAN/30163/2017]
  5. ESF (European Social Fund) through POCH (Programa Operacional Capital Humano) [SFRH/BD/138835/2018]
  6. FCT
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/QUI-QAN/30163/2017, SFRH/BD/138835/2018] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review explores current methods and new approaches for wound infection determination based on biomarkers. Enzymatic biomarkers related to wound infection are highlighted for early detection. Research shows that enzymes have great potential in detecting infection at early stages for prior diagnosis and treatment.
Infection is one of the most serious complications that can occur in wounds. Biomarkers can be used as a tool directly related to infection. So, herein current methods and new approaches for the determination of wound infection, based on biomarkers, were compared and discussed. In this review, it is highlighted the different enzymatic biomarkers related to wound infection, and how they can be used for early detection of the same. It also aims to compile the different analytical methods and describe the potential of each one. The global and critical analysis research made it possible to perceive that of all the biomarkers studied, the enzymes demonstrated great potential, through the comparison with all biomarkers, since they allow the detection of infection in very early stages, and so a previous diagnostic and treatment. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据