4.3 Article

The Rg-conditional diagnosability of international networks

期刊

THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
卷 898, 期 -, 页码 30-43

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2021.10.015

关键词

Interconnection networks; R-g-conditional connectivity; (n, k)-star graphs; (n, k)-bubble-sort graphs

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61402317]
  2. Shanxi Province Science Foundation [201901D111253]
  3. Scientific and Technological Innovation Team of Shanxi Province [201805D131007]
  4. Taiyuan University of Science and Technology Doctoral Fund [20202058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the relationship between the conditional diagnosability and connectivity of a multiprocessor system graph, exploring the calculations of diagnosability under different models and presenting the results under corresponding conditions.
The R-g-conditional diagnosability of a multiprocessor system modeled by a graph G, denoted by t(Rg)(G), is a generalization of conditional diagnosability, which restricts every vertex contains at least g fault-free neighbors. Particularly, the R-1-conditional diagnosability is the conditional diagnosability. The R-g-conditional connectivity of a graph G, denoted by kappa(Rg) (G), is the minimum number of vertices, whose deletion will disconnect the graph and every vertex of G has at least g neighbors in the remaining subgraphs. In this paper, the relationships between the R-g-conditional connectivity of a graph G and its R-g-conditional diagnosability under the PMC and MM* models are explored. We establish the Rg-conditional diagnosability t(Rg) (G) equals kappa(R2g+1) (G) + g under some reasonable conditions, except the R-1-conditional diagnosability of G under the MM* model. Moreover, we show under the MM* model, t(R1) (G) = kappa(R2)(G) with similar conditions. Applying our results, the R-g-conditional diagnosability of the (n, k)-star graphs and the (n, k)-bubble-sort graphs are determined. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据