4.5 Review

Commercial gigahertz-class NMR magnets

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ac4951

关键词

UHF NMR; NMR magnet; superconductivity; HTS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a widely used analytical technique for determining molecular structures. Bruker is currently the only company that produces commercial NMR spectrometers with a proton resonance frequency greater than 900 MHz. Recently, Bruker has successfully developed 1.1 and 1.2 GHz NMR spectrometers, which utilize high-temperature superconductors to generate the required magnetic field, surpassing the limitations of conventional low-temperature superconductors.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a wide-spread analytical technique which is used in a large range of different fields, such as quality control, food analysis, material science and structural biology. In the widest sense, NMR is an analytical technique to determine the structure of molecules. At the time of writing this manuscript, commercial NMR spectrometers with a proton resonance frequency > 900 MHz are only available from Bruker. In 2019, Bruker installed the first 1.1 GHz (25.8 T) NMR spectrometer at the St. Jude Children Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, followed by the installation of the first 1.2 GHz (28.2 T) NMR spectrometer at the University of Florence in Italy in 2020. These were the first commercial NMR spectrometers operating at magnetic fields in excess of what can be achieved with conventional low temperature superconductors, and which depend on high temperature superconductors to generate the required magnetic field. In this paper, the requirements on commercial NMR magnets are discussed and the history of high-field NMR magnets is reviewed. Bruker's R&D program for 1.1 and 1.2 GHz NMR magnets and spectrometers will be described, and some of the key properties of these first commercial NMR magnets with high-temperature superconductors are reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据