4.4 Article

The Generation of C-3α Epimer of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Its Biological Effects on Bone Mineral Density in Adult Rodents

期刊

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
卷 96, 期 5, 页码 453-464

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-015-9973-9

关键词

Vitamin D; 3-epi-25(OH)D; Cholecalciferol; Bone; Rodents

资金

  1. Collaborative Research and Development Grant from Dairy Farmers of Canada
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  4. Canada Research Chairs programs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The source and function of C-3 alpha epimer of 25(OH)D (C-3 epimer) is unknown. The objectives were to (1) establish if increasing doses of vitamin D (VD) results in a proportionate dose-response in C-3 epimer; and (2) determine the biological response of bone to C-3 epimer treatment. Sprague Dawley rats (12 weeks, n = 36 female, n = 36 male) were randomized to control AIN93-M diet (1 IU VD3/g diet) or an experimental diet for 8 weeks containing VD3 at 2 or 4 IU/g diet, C-3 epimer at 0.5 or 1 IU/g diet or 25(OH)D (0.5 IU/g diet). BW and food consumption were measured weekly. Blood was sampled at week 0, 4, and 8 for assessment of VD metabolites and bone metabolism biomarkers. DXA (week 0, 4, and 8) and in vivo micro CT (mu CT) (week 0 and 8) were performed in vivo plus ex vivo mu CT imaging and bone biomechanics. Dietary intake and anthropometry did not differ among diet groups. The dose-response of VD generated significantly elevated C-3 epimer only in females with concentrations of 4 IU VD diet group [mean 84.6 (62.5) nmol/L] exceeding control [mean 21.4 (18.5) nmol/L, p = 0.005]. Both sexes in the 25(OH)D group did not show significant increases in C-3 epimer, whereas 0.5 and 1 IU epimer groups exceeded 100 nmol/L of C-3 epimer by 8 weeks. These data suggest C-3 epimer is endogenously generated with higher intakes of VD. Endogenous and exogenous C-3 epimer accumulates in serum without impact upon bone health outcomes in a healthy young adult model over 8 weeks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据