4.6 Article

Metrological Characterization and Comparison of D415, D455, L515 RealSense Devices in the Close Range

期刊

SENSORS
卷 21, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s21227770

关键词

RealSense D415; RealSense D455; depth camera; RealSense L515; ISO 10360-13; device characterization; active stereo; LiDAR; performance comparison; reverse engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RGB-D cameras are widely used in various research fields and application scenarios, making it challenging to choose the most suitable sensor due to the increasing product options. The lack of tools to measure and compare the performance of RGB-D sensors from a metrological perspective adds to the complexity. This paper characterizes and compares three RGB-D cameras using the methodology of ISO 10360-13, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each device in different tests related to short range, systematic depth errors, and standard performance.
RGB-D cameras are employed in several research fields and application scenarios. Choosing the most appropriate sensor has been made more difficult by the increasing offer of available products. Due to the novelty of RGB-D technologies, there was a lack of tools to measure and compare performances of this type of sensor from a metrological perspective. The recent ISO 10360-13:2021 represents the most advanced international standard regulating metrological characterization of coordinate measuring systems. Part 13, specifically, considers 3D optical sensors. This paper applies the methodology of ISO 10360-13 for the characterization and comparison of three RGB-D cameras produced by Intel(R) RealSense (TM) (D415, D455, L515) in the close range (100-1500 mm). ISO 10360-13 procedures, which focus on metrological performances, are integrated with additional tests to evaluate systematic errors (acquisition of flat objects, 3D reconstruction of objects). The present paper proposes an off-the-shelf comparison which considers the performance of the sensors throughout their acquisition volume. Results have exposed the strengths and weaknesses of each device. The D415 device showed better reconstruction quality on tests strictly related to the short range. The L515 device performed better on systematic depth errors; finally, the D455 device achieved better results on tests related to the standard.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据