4.2 Review

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia: Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance and Implications for Therapy

期刊

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740109

关键词

multidrug resistance; antimicrobial resistance; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; plasmids; clonal spread; carbapenemases; ventilator-associated pneumonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common nosocomial infection pathogen, causing infections in critically ill or debilitated patients. It mainly causes urinary tract infections, skin infections, and pneumonia, with difficult treatment and high mortality. The global antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been escalating in recent decades, leading to controversies in its therapy.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), a non-lactose-fermenting gram-negative bacillus, is a common cause of nosocomial infections in critically ill or debilitated patients, particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and infections of urinary tract, intra-abdominal, wounds, skin/soft tissue, and bloodstream. PA rarely affects healthy individuals, but may cause serious infections in patients with chronic structural lung disease, comorbidities, advanced age, impaired immune defenses, or with medical devices (e.g., urinary or intravascular catheters, foreign bodies). Treatment of pseudomonal infections is difficult, as PA is intrinsically resistant to multiple antimicrobials, and may acquire new resistance determinants even while on antimicrobial therapy. Mortality associated with pseudomonal VAP or bacteremias is high (> 35%) and optimal therapy is controversial. Over the past three decades, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among PA has escalated globally, via dissemination of several international multidrug resistant epidemic clones. We discuss the importance of PA as a cause of pneumonia including health care-associated pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, VAP, the emergence of AMR to this pathogen, and approaches to therapy (both empirical and definitive).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据