4.7 Article

Dimension effect of anammox granule: Potential vs performance

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 795, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148681

关键词

Anammox granular sludge; Particle size distribution; Specific anammox activity; Nitrogen removal potential; Mass transferefficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778563, 52070163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effects of different sizes of Anammox granules on specific Anammox activity, bacterial community, and nitrogen removal potential. It was found that the nitrogen removal potential increased with the size of the granules, while mass transfer efficiency decreased. The maximum specific Anammox activity depended on the optimal balance between nitrogen removal potential and mass transfer efficiency.
Anammox granule is the key support of anammox sludge bed reactor. In this study, the anammox granules from a steady-state reactor were divided into 6 groups to investigate their dimension effects. The results of batch culti-vation showed that the anammox granules with VMD (volume surface mean diameter) of 2.17 mm had the max-imum SAA (specific anammox activity) of 399.6 +/- 37.6 mg-N/(g-VSS center dot d). The bacterial community analysis demonstrated that Candidatus Kuenenia was the main detectable AnAOB genus in the anammox granules. Q- PCR together with flow cytometry indicated that the total number of viable AnAOB cells ascended with the in-creasing anammox granular size, suggesting the enhancement of nitrogen removal potential. On the contrary, the mass transfer efficiency descended with the increasing granular size, indicating the restriction of nitrogen re-moval performance. The maximum SAA was ascribed to the optimal match between nitrogen removal potential and mass transfer efficiency. The results of this study are helpful to comprehend the nitrogen removal capacity of anammox granules and to promote the optimization of anammox process. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据