4.7 Article

A Circular Economy Life Cycle Assessment (CE-LCA) model for building components

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105683

关键词

Circular Economy (CE); assessment method; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Multi-cycling; Allocation; Building component

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition towards a Circular Economy (CE) in the built environment is essential in reducing resource consumption, emissions, and waste generation. This study develops a four-step LCA model for circular building components, and tests it with a case study on the Circular Kitchen. The evaluation of the CE-LCA model with experts shows its potential to support the transition to a circular built environment.
The transition towards a Circular Economy (CE) in the built environment is vital to reduce resource consumption, emissions and waste generation. To support the development of circular building components, assessment metrics are needed. Previous work identified Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as an important method to analyse the environmental performance in a CE context. However, questions arise about how to model and calculate circular buildings components. We develop an LCA model for circular building components in four steps. First, we elaborate on the CE principles and LCA standards to identify requirements and gaps. Second, we adapt LCA standards and propose the 'Circular Economy Life Cycle Assessment' (CE-LCA) model. Third, we test the model by assessing an exemplary building component: the Circular Kitchen (CIK). Finally, we evaluate the CE-LCA model with 44 experts. In the CE-LCA model, building components are considered as a composite of parts and materials with different and multiple use cycles; the system boundary is extended to include these cycles, dividing the impacts using a circular allocation approach. The case of the CIK shows that the CE-LCA model supports an ex-ante assessment of circular building components in theoretical context; it makes an important step to support the transition to a circular built environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据