4.7 Article

Thermal Expansion and Second Harmonic Generation Response of the Tungsten Bronze Pb2AgNb5O15

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 55, 期 6, 页码 2864-2869

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02702

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91022016, 21031005, 21231001, 91422301, 21590793]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1207]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [FRF-SD-13-008A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incorporation of transition metal element Ag was performed to explore negative thermal expansion (NTE) materials with tetragonal tungsten bronze (TTB) structures. In this study, the structure and thermal expansion behaviors of a polar TTB oxide, Pb2AgNb5O15 (PAN), were systematically investigated by high-resolution synchrotron powder diffraction, high-resolution neutron powder diffraction, transmission electron microscope (TEM), and high-temperature X-ray diffractions. The TEM and Rietveld refinements revealed that the compound PAN displays (a(TTB), 2b(TTB), 2c(TTB))-type superstructure. This superstructure within the a-b plane is caused by the ordering of A-site cations, while the doubling of the c axis is mainly induced by a slight tilt distortion of the NbO6 octahedra. The transition metal Ag has larger spontaneous polarization displacements than Pb, but the Pb-O covalence seems to be weakened compared to the potassium counterpart Pb2KNb5O15 (PKN), which may account for the similar Curie temperature and uniaxial NTE behavior for PAN and PKN. Powder second harmonic generation (SHG) measurement indicates that PAN displays a moderate SHG response of similar to 0.2 xX LiNbO3 (or similar to 100 X alpha-SiO2) under 1064 nm laser radiation. The magnitudes of the local dipole moments in NbO6 and PbOx polyhedra were quantified using bond-valence approach. We show that the SHG response stems from the superposition of dipole moments of both the PbOx and NbO6 polyhedra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据