4.8 Article

PLAZA 5.0: extending the scope and power of comparative and functional genomics in plants

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 D1, 页码 D1468-D1474

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1024

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) for ELIXIR Belgium [I002819N]
  2. Ghent University BOF Grant [BOF24Y2019001901]
  3. VIB
  4. Ghent University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PLAZA is a platform for plant genomics research, integrating 134 high-quality plant genomes and offering new features and updated characteristics in the latest release. This version provides extended support for plant biologists and a versatile toolbox for plant genomics.
PLAZA is a platform for comparative, evolutionary, and functional plant genomics. It makes a broad set of genomes, data types and analysis tools available to researchers through a user-friendly website, an API, and bulk downloads. In this latest release of the PLAZA platform, we are integrating a record number of 134 high-quality plant genomes, split up over two instances: PLAZA Dicots 5.0 and PLAZA Monocots 5.0. This number of genomes corresponds with a massive expansion in the number of available species when compared to PLAZA 4.0, which offered access to 71 species, a 89% overall increase. The PLAZA 5.0 release contains information for 5 882 730 genes, and offers pre-computed gene families and phylogenetic trees for 5 274 684 protein-coding genes. This latest release also comes with a set of new and updated features: a new BED import functionality for the workbench, improved interactive visualizations for functional enrichments and genome-wide mapping of gene sets, and a fully redesigned and extended API. Taken together, this new version offers extended support for plant biologists working on different families within the green plant lineage and provides an efficient and versatile toolbox for plant genomics. All PLAZA releases are accessible from the portal website: https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/plaza/.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据