4.7 Article

Modeling and nonlinear dynamic analysis of bolt joints considering fractal surfaces

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 108, 期 2, 页码 1071-1099

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-022-07255-3

关键词

Bolt joints; Fractal contact model; Dynamic behavior

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [U1708254]
  2. National Key R & D Program of China [2019YFB2004400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a nonlinear dynamic model of bolted joint structure is proposed based on the fractal contact model, taking into account the relative sliding behavior. The model is experimentally validated and numerical simulation results show various nonlinear phenomena. The model predictions are helpful for preventing resonance and instability.
The surface morphology has an important influence on the dynamic response and bolt loosening of bolted joints. In this paper, based on the fractal contact model, an original nonlinear dynamic model of the bolted joint structure including the piecewise restoring force and dry friction is proposed to predict the normal and tangential coupling vibration and investigate the dynamic characteristics. The relative sliding behavior between bolts and connected parts is considered for avoiding the bolt loosening failure, which is rarely mentioned in previous studies. Furthermore, normal and tangential fractal contact stiffness models are experimentally validated by comparing the modal test and finite element simulation with virtual material layer. The joint interface is equalized as the equivalent layer in the FE model, and its material parameters are deduced by the measured surface profiles. Numerical simulation is employed to investigate the effects of harmonic excitation, bolt preload and fractal parameters on the dynamic characteristics. The abundant nonlinear phenomena, such as quasi-period motion, chaotic motion and jump discontinuous, are captured. The predicted nonlinear vibration response is helpful for preventing the resonance and instability of system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据