4.7 Article

Reverse froth flotation separation of limonite and quartz with cationic gemini surfactant

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107391

关键词

Gemini surfactant; Reverse froth flotation; Limonite; Separation; Quartz

资金

  1. NSFC [51764022]
  2. Fok Ying Tong Education Foundation [161046]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M673551XB]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Yueqi outstanding scholar award of CUMTB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel collector, EDDA, was synthesized and used in the reverse froth flotation of limonite and quartz. The results showed that EDDA had good floatation ability and selectivity to quartz, and it was more effective than the commonly used DDA. The high-efficiency separation of limonite and quartz could be achieved without adding depressant by using EDDA at the natural pH range.
In this paper, a cationic gemini surfactant ethane-1,2-dodecyldimethylammonium bromide (EDDA) was synthesized and used as a novel collector for the reverse froth flotation of limonite and quartz. According to the pure mineral flotation results, EDDA has good floatation ability and selectivity to quartz over the entire pH range of the slurry and is significantly more effective than dodecylamine (DDA). The experimental results of artificial mixed minerals show that EDDA can achieve high-efficiency separation of limonite and quartz without adding depressant. When the slurry is at natural pH (7-8) and EDDA is 1 x 10-5 mol/L, the concentrate with iron recovery of 86.14% and iron grade of 59.53% can be obtained. The zeta potential measurement shows that the EDDA has a significant effect on the potential of quartz. The results of FT-IR analysis confirmed the physical adsorption between EDDA and quartz. The agent preferentially modifies the quartz surface, improves the hydrophobicity of the quartz, and realizes the effective separation of limonite and quartz.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据