4.5 Review

Prognostic significance of PTOV1 expression in cancers A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 50, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028149

关键词

cancer; meta-analysis; prognosis; protocol; PTOV1

资金

  1. Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Special Fund for Clinical Research, China [320.6750.17116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate the associations between PTOV1 expression and overall survival, disease-free survival/relapse-free survival, progression-free survival, and clinicopathological features in cancer patients, providing a high-quality synthesis to understand the potential role of PTOV1 in cancer.
Background: Prostate tumor overexpressed-1 (PTOV1) was firstly depicted as gene and protein overexpressed in prostate cancers and preneoplastic lesions of high-grad intraepithelial neoplasia. Recently, people have paid recent attention to the oncogenic PTOV1 protein as a regulator with various cellular functions and pathways that tend to enhance cell growth and self-renewal in numerous cancer cell types. Its prognostic role in cancers remains controversial. Methods: Eligible studies are identified by comprehensively searching literature in all available databases. The associations between PTOV1 expression and overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, progression-free survival, and clinicopathological characteristics are estimated by employing hazard ratios and the confidence intervals of 95%. STATA 12.0 software was adopted to perform the meta-analysis. Results: This study will provide high-quality synthesis to evaluate the associations between PTOV1 expression and overall survival, disease-free survival /relapse-free survival , progression-free survival, and clinicopathological features. Conclusion: The study will provide updated evidence to assess whether the expression of PTOV1 is in association with poor prognosis in patients with cancers. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020183853.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据