4.4 Article

A New Two-Stage Degradation Model for the Preload of Linear Motion Ball Guide Considering Machining Errors

期刊

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4053625

关键词

linear motion ball guide (LMBG); preload degradation; machining error; wear rate; bearings; contact area

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51905274]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Projects of China [2018ZX04039001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new degradation model for predicting the preload variation of LMBG, taking into account machining errors. Experimental results show that the model considering machining errors has higher prediction accuracy compared to the model without considering machining errors. Furthermore, the effects of waviness errors, external load, and feed speed on preload degradation were discussed.
Preload, which is widely applied in linear motion ball guide (LMBG) to eliminate clearance and increase stiffness, gradually decreases owing to wear, resulting in the degradation of the load-bearing capability and dynamic response of LMBG. However, no solution can be found on the modeling of the preload degradation of LMBG considering raceway profile error, ball diameter error, etc. Therefore, this paper presented a new two-stage degradation model to predict the preload variation of LMBG with considering machining errors. The model was experimentally verified with the prediction accuracy much higher than the model considering no machining errors at either of the two wear stages, which demonstrates the effectiveness of considering machining errors. Additionally, the effects of waviness errors, external load, and feed speed on the preload degradation of LMBG were discussed. The simulation results indicate that the preload loss rate rises with the increase of waviness error, external load and feed speed. For obtaining a longer effective service life of LMBG, it is helpful to select appropriate external load and feed speed conditions and improve the processing technique as well as the machined surface quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据