4.6 Article

Clinician knowledge and behaviors related to the 4Ms framework of Age-Friendly Health Systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 789-800

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17571

关键词

4Ms framework; Age-Friendly Health Systems; health care

资金

  1. John A. Hartford Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The majority of clinicians recognize the need for different care approaches for older patients, but they have limited understanding of the specificities of the 4Ms framework and do not always consider their patients' age when determining care plans. Health care settings implementing the 4Ms framework may be doing so incompletely, highlighting the need for training primary care providers to effectively adopt this evidence-based approach in clinical practice.
Background The Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) aims to improve the experience of care for adults aged 65 years and older through the 4Ms framework, an evidence-based approach to care planning that emphasizes what matters most to the older person, mentation, mobility, and medication. The aim of this study was to examine clinicians' attitudes, knowledge, and practices concerning AFHS and the 4Ms. Methods We surveyed U.S.-based health care providers randomly identified from the Medscape database. The sample was weighted based on sex, U.S. Census region, and ethnic diversity of health occupations. We examined the differences between cohorts using proportions tests and logistic regression models. Results More than 90% of clinicians (n = 1684) agreed that older patients require a different approach to care than younger patients. Fifty percent of clinicians always take the age of their patient into consideration when determining care. A majority of clinicians said they discuss each of the 4Ms with older patients and/or their family caregivers. Screening for depression and review of high-risk medication use are among the leading types of age-friendly care that clinicians provide to older patients. A minority of clinicians are asking older adults about and aligning the care plan with What Matters. Conclusions A majority of clinicians acknowledged the benefits of providing care via AFHS but reported limited knowledge of the specificities of the 4Ms framework and are not necessarily taking the age of their patients into consideration when determining the best form of care. Health care settings that have implemented the 4Ms framework appear to be doing so in an incomplete way. Our study reinforces the case for training primary care providers on how to adopt the evidence-based 4Ms framework in clinical practice effectively and consistently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据