4.8 Article

Efficient Pulsed Dynamic Nuclear Polarization with the X-Inverse-X Sequence

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 4, 页码 1513-1516

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c09900

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through an Emmy Noether grant [321027114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is a promising approach to enhance the sensitivity of high-resolution magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR. A new DNP pulse sequence, XiX DNP, has been introduced with a faster transfer of polarization from electrons to H-1, resulting in a 2-fold higher gain in sensitivity compared to existing sequences.
Pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is a promising new approach to enhancing the sensitivity of high-resolution magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR. In pulsed DNP, the transfer of polarization from unpaired electrons to nuclei (usually H-1) is induced by a sequence of microwave pulses. Enhancement factors of the thermal polarization are expected to be independent of the magnetic field, and sample heating by absorption of microwave irradiation will be strongly reduced. The development of DNP pulse sequences is still in its infancy. Of the two basic sequences in existence, NOVEL and TOP DNP, the former is, due to an extremely high power requirement, incompatible with high-resolution MAS NMR, while the latter displays a relatively slow transfer of polarization from electrons to H-1. We introduce here a new pulse sequence for DNP of solids, termed X-inverse-X (XiX) DNP. In experiments at 1.2 T, XiX DNP produces, compared to TOP DNP, a 2-fold higher gain in sensitivity. Our data suggest that a faster transfer of polarization from electrons to H-1 is behind the superior performance of XiX DNP. Numerical simulations and experiments indicate that microwave pulse lengths can be chosen across a broad range, without loss of efficiency. These findings are a substantial step toward the implementation of pulsed DNP at high magnetic fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据